Nothing Phone (3a) Lite vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
The Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $249 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads — 75/100 vs 52/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 884,207); the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite is noticeably lighter (199g vs 215g).
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Lighter: 199g vs 215g
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $1999
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 78/100)
- Higher value score: 58/100 vs 54/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 884207
- Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 2813
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (76/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 scores 23 points higher (75/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads (76/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (76/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite is a bit better (48/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 are nearly equal (58/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 884207 | 3065623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 2910 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 9174 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2392x1080 | 2184x1968 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 145 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×78.0×8.3 mm | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | $249 | $1999 |
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2392x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2184x1968
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Nothing Phone (3a) Lite and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads Nothing Phone (3a) Lite by 71.2% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1750. Nothing Phone (3a) Lite was $1750 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (91/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (76/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite is a bit better (48/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 are nearly equal (58/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite by 23 points (75/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?
The Nothing Phone (3a) Lite has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads on performance (91/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?
The Nothing Phone (3a) Lite is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.