Nothing Phone (3a) Lite vs Redmi K90 Ultra
The Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro, while the Redmi K90 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $249 and $420. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 52/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Ultra has the bigger battery (8550 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi K90 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 884,207); the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite is noticeably lighter (199g vs 227g).
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
Redmi K90 Ultra
- Lighter: 199g vs 227g
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $420
- Better portability (56/100 vs 40/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 884207
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 8550 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite vs the Redmi K90 Ultra, the Redmi K90 Ultra scores 21 points higher (73/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (3a) Lite — 58/100, Redmi K90 Ultra — 82/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Ultra (56/100 vs 40/100).
| Specification | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite | Redmi K90 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 884207 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2392x1080 | 1280x2772 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8550 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×78.0×8.3 mm | 162.9×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | $249 | $420 |
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi K90 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2392x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K90 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Redmi K90 Ultra
- 8550 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nothing Phone (3a) Lite and Redmi K90 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi K90 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3a) Lite by 71.7% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $171. Nothing Phone (3a) Lite was $171 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (92/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (78/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Ultra (56/100 vs 40/100).
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite or the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite by 21 points (73/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite and the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The Nothing Phone (3a) Lite has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Redmi K90 Ultra — 73/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite or the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The Redmi K90 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite over the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The Nothing Phone (3a) Lite is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi K90 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.