Nothing Phone (3) vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
The Nothing Phone (3) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $799 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 76/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (3) has the bigger battery (5150 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 2,306,162); the Nothing Phone (3) is noticeably lighter (198g vs 214g).
Nothing Phone (3)
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Bigger battery: 5150 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 65W vs 60W
- Lighter: 198g vs 214g
- Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $1299
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 61/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 2306162
- Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 2162
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 6847
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 25W vs 15W
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 81/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 81/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (51/100 vs 49/100)
- Better value for money (76/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Nothing Phone (3) vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 8 points higher (84/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (76/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3) are nearly equal (88/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (86/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3) and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (63/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3) are nearly equal (51/100 vs 49/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (76/100 vs 64/100).
| Specification | Nothing Phone (3) | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2306162 | 3515964 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2162 | 3601 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6847 | 10686 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2800x1260 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5150 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 65W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 25W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 157 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.0 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.6×75.6×9.0 mm | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 214 g | |
| Launch price | $799 | $1299 |
Nothing Phone (3)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Nothing Phone (3)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing Phone (3)
- 5150 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
We compared Nothing Phone (3) and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3) by 34.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $500. Nothing Phone (3) was $500 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (96/100 vs 81/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3) are nearly equal (88/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (86/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3) and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (63/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3) are nearly equal (51/100 vs 49/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (76/100 vs 64/100).
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (3) or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra edges out the Nothing Phone (3) by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (3) and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Nothing Phone (3) has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (3) or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 81/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (3) or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Nothing Phone (3) over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Nothing Phone (3) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.