Nokia X30 vs Realme GT 7T
The Nokia X30 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, while the Realme GT 7T (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Max. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme GT 7T leads — 70/100 vs 45/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Realme GT 7T has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4200); the Realme GT 7T is faster in AnTuTu (2,074,834 vs 592,015); the Nokia X30 is noticeably lighter (185g vs 202g).
Nokia X30
Realme GT 7T
- Lighter: 185g vs 202g
- Better portability (68/100 vs 57/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2074834 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 1579 vs 905
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6100 vs 2003
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (77/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (40/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 29/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 69/100)
Comparing the Nokia X30 vs the Realme GT 7T, the Realme GT 7T scores 25 points higher (70/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 7T leads (77/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 7T leads (90/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 7T significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (77/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Realme GT 7T notably outperforms the Nokia X30 (84/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 7T and the Nokia X30 are nearly equal (40/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 7T significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (90/100 vs 29/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia X30 is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).
| Specification | Nokia X30 | Realme GT 7T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Max | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 2074834 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 1579 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 6100 | |
| Display | 6.4" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1280x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 700 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP67 | — | |
| Dimensions | 158.9×73.9×8.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 185 g | 202 g | |
| Launch price | — | $335 |
Nokia X30
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 16MP
Realme GT 7T
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia X30
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Realme GT 7T
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia X30
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Realme GT 7T
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Nokia X30 and Realme GT 7T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Realme GT 7T leads Nokia X30 by 71.5% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia X30
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 7T significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (77/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Realme GT 7T notably outperforms the Nokia X30 (84/100 vs 69/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 7T and the Nokia X30 are nearly equal (40/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 7T significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (90/100 vs 29/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia X30 is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).
Which is better: the Nokia X30 or the Realme GT 7T?
The Realme GT 7T significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 by 25 points (70/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia X30 and the Realme GT 7T?
The Nokia X30 has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Realme GT 7T — 70/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia X30 or the Realme GT 7T?
The Realme GT 7T leads on performance (77/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Nokia X30 over the Realme GT 7T?
The Nokia X30 is a better fit for everyday use. The Realme GT 7T is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.