Nokia X20 vs ZTE Axon 41 5G
The Nokia X20 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480, while the ZTE Axon 41 5G (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 41 5G leads — 56/100 vs 39/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 41 5G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4470); the ZTE Axon 41 5G is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 435,710); the ZTE Axon 41 5G is noticeably lighter (203g vs 220g).
Nokia X20
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- Overall rating 39/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 435710
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 689
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 1597
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4470 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz vs 60Hz
- Lighter: 203g vs 220g
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 38/100)
- Better camera (51/100 vs 47/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (67/100 vs 42/100)
- Better portability (41/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Nokia X20 vs the ZTE Axon 41 5G, the ZTE Axon 41 5G scores 17 points higher (56/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G leads (61/100 vs 38/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G leads (52/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G notably outperforms the Nokia X20 (61/100 vs 38/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G notably outperforms the Nokia X20 (67/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G and the Nokia X20 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 47/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G notably outperforms the Nokia X20 (52/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (41/100 vs 36/100).
| Specification | Nokia X20 | ZTE Axon 41 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 435710 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 689 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1597 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" Amoled | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4470 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 450 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 168.9×79.7×9.1 mm | 163.9×76.2×9.5 mm | |
| Weight | 220 g | 203 g | |
| Launch price | $415 | — |
Nokia X20
- Main: 64MP f/1.79
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Nokia X20
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- 6.7" Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia X20
- 4470 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia X20 and ZTE Axon 41 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 41 5G leads Nokia X20 by 56.9% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 41 5G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G notably outperforms the Nokia X20 (61/100 vs 38/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G notably outperforms the Nokia X20 (67/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G and the Nokia X20 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 47/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G notably outperforms the Nokia X20 (52/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (41/100 vs 36/100).
Which is better: the Nokia X20 or the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The ZTE Axon 41 5G is noticeably better than the Nokia X20 — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia X20 and the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The Nokia X20 has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the ZTE Axon 41 5G — 56/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia X20 or the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The ZTE Axon 41 5G leads on performance (61/100 vs 38/100).
Should you choose the Nokia X20 over the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The Nokia X20 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 41 5G is a better fit for active users.