Nokia X20 vs Nubia Z50S Pro
The Nokia X20 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480, while the Nubia Z50S Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2; estimated prices are $415 and $662. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nubia Z50S Pro leads — 37/100 vs 20/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Nubia Z50S Pro has the bigger battery (5100 mAh vs 4470); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP.
Nokia X20
Nubia Z50S Pro
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 220g vs 228g
- Cheaper: $415 vs $662
- Better design/ergonomics (25/100 vs 15/100)
- Better value for money (81/100 vs 64/100)
- Bigger battery: 5100 vs 4470 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Better camera (51/100 vs 45/100)
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 23/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia X20 vs the Nubia Z50S Pro, the Nubia Z50S Pro scores 17 points higher (37/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Nubia Z50S Pro leads (54/100 vs 23/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia X20 leads (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Nubia Z50S Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia X20 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Nubia Z50S Pro is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Nubia Z50S Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia X20 (54/100 vs 23/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia X20 is a bit better (25/100 vs 15/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia X20 notably outperforms the Nubia Z50S Pro (81/100 vs 64/100).
| Specification | Nokia X20 | Nubia Z50S Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 435710 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 689 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1597 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4470 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13, MyOS 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 450 nits | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 168.9×79.7×9.1 mm | 163.9×76.3×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 220 g | 228 g | |
| Price | $415 | $662 |
Nokia X20
- Main: 64MP f/1.79
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 32MP
Nubia Z50S Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Nokia X20
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Nubia Z50S Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia X20
- 4470 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Nubia Z50S Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Price difference: $247. Nokia X20 is cheaper by $247.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Nubia Z50S Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia X20 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nubia Z50S Pro is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nubia Z50S Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia X20 (54/100 vs 23/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia X20 is a bit better (25/100 vs 15/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Nokia X20 notably outperforms the Nubia Z50S Pro (81/100 vs 64/100).
Which is better: the Nokia X20 or the Nubia Z50S Pro?
The Nubia Z50S Pro is noticeably better than the Nokia X20 — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia X20 and the Nubia Z50S Pro?
The Nokia X20 has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Nubia Z50S Pro — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia X20 or the Nubia Z50S Pro?
The Nubia Z50S Pro leads on camera score (51/100 vs 45/100).
Should you choose the Nokia X20 over the Nubia Z50S Pro?
The Nokia X20 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Nubia Z50S Pro is a better fit for everyday use.