Nokia G60 vs Redmi A5
The Nokia G60 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the Redmi A5 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G36; estimated prices are $329 and $90. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G60 leads — 29/100 vs 13/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi A5 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Nokia G60 is faster in AnTuTu (592,015 vs 195,539).
Nokia G60
Redmi A5
- Higher AnTuTu: 592015 vs 195539
- Better Geekbench Single: 905 vs 189
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2003 vs 781
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Lighter: 190g vs 196g
- Better camera (26/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Cheaper: $90 vs $329
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 24/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 87/100)
Comparing the Nokia G60 vs the Redmi A5, the Nokia G60 scores 16 points higher (29/100 vs 13/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G60 leads (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi A5 leads (36/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi A5 leads (100/100 vs 87/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Nokia G60 significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G60 notably outperforms the Redmi A5 (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi A5 is a bit better (36/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia G60 is a bit better (62/100 vs 55/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi A5 is a bit better (100/100 vs 87/100).
| Specification | Nokia G60 | Redmi A5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | MediaTek Helio G36 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 195539 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 189 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 781 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.9" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 2GB / 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Dimensions | 166.0×75.9×8.6 mm | — | |
| Weight | 190 g | 196 g | |
| Price | $329 | $90 |
Nokia G60
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Redmi A5
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Nokia G60
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2408x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi A5
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Nokia G60
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Redmi A5
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G60 and Redmi A5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia G60 leads Redmi A5 by 202.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $239. Redmi A5 is cheaper by $239.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia G60 significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia G60 notably outperforms the Redmi A5 (26/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi A5 is a bit better (36/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia G60 is a bit better (62/100 vs 55/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi A5 is a bit better (100/100 vs 87/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G60 or the Redmi A5?
The Nokia G60 is noticeably better than the Redmi A5 — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia G60 and the Redmi A5?
The Nokia G60 has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the Redmi A5 — 13/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia G60 or the Redmi A5?
The Nokia G60 leads on camera score (26/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G60 over the Redmi A5?
The Nokia G60 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Redmi A5 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.