Nokia G60 vs Poco C85 4G
The Nokia G60 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the Poco C85 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra; estimated prices are $329 and $92. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco C85 4G leads — 32/100 vs 29/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C85 4G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4500); the Nokia G60 is faster in AnTuTu (592,015 vs 358,383); the Nokia G60 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 205g).
Nokia G60
Poco C85 4G
- Higher AnTuTu: 592015 vs 358383
- Better Geekbench Single: 905 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2003 vs 1416
- Lighter: 190g vs 205g
- Better camera (26/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 33W vs 20W
- Cheaper: $92 vs $329
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 24/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 87/100)
Comparing the Nokia G60 vs the Poco C85 4G, the Poco C85 4G scores 3 points higher (32/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C85 4G leads (48/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C85 4G leads (100/100 vs 87/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Nokia G60 and the Poco C85 4G are nearly equal (26/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C85 4G notably outperforms the Nokia G60 (48/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia G60 notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (62/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C85 4G is a bit better (100/100 vs 87/100).
| Specification | Nokia G60 | Poco C85 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 358383 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 432 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 1416 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.9" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | 810 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.0×75.9×8.6 mm | 171.6×79.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 205 g | |
| Price | $329 | $92 |
Nokia G60
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Poco C85 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Nokia G60
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2408x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C85 4G
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia G60
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Poco C85 4G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G60 and Poco C85 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia G60 leads Poco C85 4G by 65.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $237. Poco C85 4G is cheaper by $237.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia G60 and the Poco C85 4G are nearly equal (26/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C85 4G notably outperforms the Nokia G60 (48/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia G60 notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (62/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco C85 4G is a bit better (100/100 vs 87/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G60 or the Poco C85 4G?
The Poco C85 4G edges out the Nokia G60 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia G60 and the Poco C85 4G?
The Nokia G60 has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the Poco C85 4G — 32/100.
Should you choose the Nokia G60 over the Poco C85 4G?
The Nokia G60 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Poco C85 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.