Nokia G400 vs Redmi 4X
The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Redmi 4X (2017) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 435. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G400 leads — 43/100 vs 20/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia G400 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4100); the main camera is 48 MP vs 13 MP; the Nokia G400 is faster in AnTuTu (477,542 vs 150,628); the Nokia G400 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 4X doesn't; the Redmi 4X is noticeably lighter (150g vs 198g).
Nokia G400
Redmi 4X
- Higher AnTuTu: 477542 vs 150628
- Better Geekbench Single: 746 vs 141
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1816 vs 618
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4100 mAh
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (41/100 vs 8/100)
- Better camera (33/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 35/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 32/100)
- Lighter: 150g vs 198g
- Better portability (76/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the Redmi 4X, the Nokia G400 scores 23 points higher (43/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 leads (41/100 vs 8/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 leads (33/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4X (41/100 vs 8/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4X (66/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Redmi 4X (33/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia G400 is a bit better (43/100 vs 35/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi 4X notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (76/100 vs 51/100).
| Specification | Nokia G400 | Redmi 4X | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 150628 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 141 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 618 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 5.0" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4100 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 2GB / 3GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 16GB / 32GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm | 139.2×70.0×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 150 g | |
| Launch price | — | $120 |
Nokia G400
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi 4X
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Nokia G400
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi 4X
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Nokia G400
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Redmi 4X
- 4100 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Nokia G400 and Redmi 4X, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia G400 leads Redmi 4X by 217.0% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia G400
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4X (41/100 vs 8/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4X (66/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Redmi 4X (33/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nokia G400 is a bit better (43/100 vs 35/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi 4X notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (76/100 vs 51/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the Redmi 4X?
The Nokia G400 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4X by 23 points (43/100 vs 20/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the Redmi 4X?
The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Redmi 4X — 20/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia G400 or the Redmi 4X?
The Nokia G400 leads on camera score (33/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G400 or the Redmi 4X?
The Nokia G400 leads on performance (41/100 vs 8/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the Redmi 4X?
The Nokia G400 is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi 4X is a better fit for everyday use.