Nokia G400 vs Realme 16T
The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Realme 16T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme 16T leads — 48/100 vs 43/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Realme 16T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Realme 16T is faster in AnTuTu (524,785 vs 477,542); the Nokia G400 has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme 16T doesn't.
Nokia G400
Realme 16T
- Better camera (33/100 vs 32/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 524785 vs 477542
- Better Geekbench Single: 771 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1980 vs 1816
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 20W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (43/100 vs 41/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (75/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the Realme 16T, the Realme 16T scores 5 points higher (48/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme 16T leads (64/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme 16T and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Realme 16T is a bit better (75/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the Realme 16T are nearly equal (33/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme 16T notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (64/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Nokia G400 | Realme 16T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm | 8.9×None×None mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | $200 |
Nokia G400
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Realme 16T
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Nokia G400
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme 16T
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nokia G400
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Realme 16T
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G400 and Realme 16T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Realme 16T leads Nokia G400 by 9.0% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia G400
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Realme 16T and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Realme 16T is a bit better (75/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the Realme 16T are nearly equal (33/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme 16T notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (64/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the Realme 16T?
The Realme 16T edges out the Nokia G400 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the Realme 16T?
The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Realme 16T — 48/100.
Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the Realme 16T?
The Nokia G400 is a better fit for everyday use. The Realme 16T is a better fit for everyday use.