Nokia G100 vs Samsung Galaxy A05
The Nokia G100 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, while the Samsung Galaxy A05 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85; estimated prices are $79 and $89. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A05 leads — 19/100 vs 14/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A05 is faster in AnTuTu (346,495 vs 320,666).
Nokia G100
Samsung Galaxy A05
- Cheaper: $79 vs $89
- Overall rating 14/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 346495 vs 320666
- Better Geekbench Single: 420 vs 345
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1364 vs 1065
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (24/100 vs 2/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Nokia G100 vs the Samsung Galaxy A05, the Samsung Galaxy A05 scores 5 points higher (19/100 vs 14/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A05 leads (24/100 vs 2/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A05 notably outperforms the Nokia G100 (24/100 vs 2/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A05 and the Nokia G100 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 56/100. In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Nokia G100 | Samsung Galaxy A05 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | 320666 | 346495 | |
| Geekbench Single | 345 | 420 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1065 | 1364 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 25W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 128GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 Snow Cone | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.6×76.7×8.9 mm | 168.8×78.2×8.8 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 195 g | |
| Price | $79 | $89 |
Nokia G100
- Main: 13MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A05
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Nokia G100
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A05
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Nokia G100
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A05
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G100 and Samsung Galaxy A05, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy A05 leads Nokia G100 by 7.5% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $10. Nokia G100 is cheaper by $10.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A05 notably outperforms the Nokia G100 (24/100 vs 2/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A05 and the Nokia G100 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 56/100.
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Nokia G100 or the Samsung Galaxy A05?
The Samsung Galaxy A05 edges out the Nokia G100 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia G100 and the Samsung Galaxy A05?
The Nokia G100 has a MobileRank rating of 14/100, the Samsung Galaxy A05 — 19/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia G100 or the Samsung Galaxy A05?
The Samsung Galaxy A05 leads on camera score (24/100 vs 2/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G100 over the Samsung Galaxy A05?
The Nokia G100 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A05 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.