Nokia C31 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Nokia C31 (2022) runs on the Unisoc, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 35/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5050); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C31 doesn't; the Nokia C31 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 226g).
Nokia C31
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 200g vs 226g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5050 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 37/100)
Comparing the Nokia C31 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 52 points higher (87/100 vs 35/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (84/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C31 is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Nokia C31 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5050 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Nokia C31
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia C31
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C31
- 5050 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Nokia C31
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (84/100 vs 37/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C31 is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C31 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 by 52 points (87/100 vs 35/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C31 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia C31 has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C31 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C31 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia C31 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.