Nokia C22 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Nokia C22 (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 30/100 (a 57-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C22 doesn't; the Nokia C22 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 226g).
Nokia C22
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 190g vs 226g
- Better portability (59/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Nokia C22 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 57 points higher (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C22 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (59/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Nokia C22 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 (Go edition) | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Nokia C22
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia C22
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C22
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Nokia C22
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (84/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (81/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C22 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (59/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C22 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 by 57 points (87/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C22 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia C22 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C22 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C22 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia C22 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.