Nokia C22 vs Tecno Phantom V Fold

The Nokia C22 (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the Tecno Phantom V Fold (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000+. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Phantom V Fold leads — 64/100 vs 30/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Tecno Phantom V Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C22 doesn't; the Nokia C22 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 299g).

The Tecno Phantom V Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 by 34 points (64/100 vs 30/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C22
Performance
Display 39
Camera 10
Battery 43
Portability 59
Value for money
Tecno Phantom V Fold
Performance 73
Display 79
Camera 58
Battery 48
Portability 47
Value for money
What makes Nokia C22 better?
  • Lighter: 190g vs 299g

  • Better portability (59/100 vs 47/100)
What makes Tecno Phantom V Fold better?
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 10W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP

  • Better camera (58/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (48/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia C22 vs the Tecno Phantom V Fold, the Tecno Phantom V Fold scores 34 points higher (64/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold leads (58/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (79/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (58/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C22 is a bit better (59/100 vs 47/100).

Nokia C22: The Nokia C22 is a better fit for everyday use.
Tecno Phantom V Fold: The Tecno Phantom V Fold is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia C22 Tecno Phantom V Fold
Processor Unisoc MediaTek Dimensity 9000+
AnTuTu 1453683
Geekbench Single 1967
Geekbench Multi 5401
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 720x1600 2000x2296
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 10W 45W
Main camera 13 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 13 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 16 MP
RAM 2GB / 3GB 12GB
Storage 64GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 13 (Go edition) Android 13, HiOS 13 Fold
Brightness (peak) 1100 nits
NFC no yes
Dimensions 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm
Weight 190 g 299 g
Launch price
Camera comparison
Nokia C22
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera
Tecno Phantom V Fold
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
58
camera
Display comparison
Nokia C22
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display
Tecno Phantom V Fold
  • 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2000x2296
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Battery and charging
Nokia C22
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Tecno Phantom V Fold
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (79/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (58/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia C22 is a bit better (59/100 vs 47/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C22 or the Tecno Phantom V Fold?

The Tecno Phantom V Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 by 34 points (64/100 vs 30/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia C22 and the Tecno Phantom V Fold?

The Nokia C22 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Phantom V Fold — 64/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia C22 or the Tecno Phantom V Fold?

The Tecno Phantom V Fold leads on camera score (58/100 vs 10/100).

Should you choose the Nokia C22 over the Tecno Phantom V Fold?

The Nokia C22 is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Phantom V Fold is a better fit for active users.