Nokia C22 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
The Nokia C22 (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads — 78/100 vs 30/100 (a 48-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C22 doesn't; the Nokia C22 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 215g).
Nokia C22
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Lighter: 190g vs 215g
- Overall rating 30/100
- Faster charging: 60W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (67/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (78/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 59/100)
Comparing the Nokia C22 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra scores 48 points higher (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (67/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (78/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (67/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Nokia C22 (61/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (66/100 vs 59/100).
| Specification | Nokia C22 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3453998 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1968x2184 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 (Go edition) | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | — | |
| Weight | 190 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2199 |
Nokia C22
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Nokia C22
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C22
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Nokia C22
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (78/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (67/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Nokia C22 (61/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (66/100 vs 59/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C22 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 by 48 points (78/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C22 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Nokia C22 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 78/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C22 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on camera score (67/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C22 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Nokia C22 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.