Nokia C200 vs Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
The Nokia C200 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads — 33/100 vs 8/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro has the bigger battery (4600 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is thinner (7.4mm vs 8.8mm).
Nokia C200
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Lighter: 172g vs 175g
- Better design/ergonomics (85/100 vs 81/100)
- Bigger battery: 4600 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (37/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia C200 vs the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro scores 25 points higher (33/100 vs 8/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads (37/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia C200 (37/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia C200 and the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C200 | Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio A22 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | — | |
| Display | 6.1" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1560 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 66W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 156.5×73.1×8.8 mm | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 172 g | 175 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C200
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C200
- 6.1" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C200
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (37/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia C200 (37/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia C200 and the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C200 or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 by 25 points (33/100 vs 8/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C200 and the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Nokia C200 has a MobileRank rating of 8/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C200 or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads on camera score (37/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C200 over the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Nokia C200 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.