Nokia C2 Tennen vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Nokia C2 Tennen (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 17/100 (a 70-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 155,362); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C2 Tennen doesn't; the Nokia C2 Tennen is noticeably lighter (180g vs 226g).
Nokia C2 Tennen
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 180g vs 226g
- Better portability (60/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 155362
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 486
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 10/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Nokia C2 Tennen vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 70 points higher (87/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (93/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (84/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (81/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C2 Tennen notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Nokia C2 Tennen | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio A22 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | 9553 | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 150.6×72.4×9.1 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Nokia C2 Tennen
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia C2 Tennen
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C2 Tennen
- 3000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Nokia C2 Tennen and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Nokia C2 Tennen by 95.2% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia C2 Tennen
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (93/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (84/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (81/100 vs 12/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C2 Tennen notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C2 Tennen or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen by 70 points (87/100 vs 17/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C2 Tennen and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia C2 Tennen has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C2 Tennen or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia C2 Tennen or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C2 Tennen over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia C2 Tennen is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.