Nokia C2 Tennen vs Redmi K90 Ultra
The Nokia C2 Tennen (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Redmi K90 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 17/100 (a 56-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Ultra has the bigger battery (8550 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 50 MP; the Redmi K90 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,233,695 vs 155,362); the Redmi K90 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C2 Tennen doesn't; the Nokia C2 Tennen is noticeably lighter (180g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C2 Tennen
Redmi K90 Ultra
What makes Nokia C2 Tennen better?
- Lighter: 180g vs 227g
- Better portability (60/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Redmi K90 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3233695 vs 155362
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 486
- Bigger battery: 8550 vs 3000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 10/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia C2 Tennen vs the Redmi K90 Ultra, the Redmi K90 Ultra scores 56 points higher (73/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads (37/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (92/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (94/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra notably outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (37/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (78/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C2 Tennen notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Ultra (60/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia C2 Tennen | Redmi K90 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio A22 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | 3233695 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | 9287 | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 1280x2772 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 8550 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 150.6×72.4×9.1 mm | 162.9×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | — | $420 |
Camera comparison
Nokia C2 Tennen
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Redmi K90 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Nokia C2 Tennen
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Redmi K90 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia C2 Tennen
- 3000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Redmi K90 Ultra
- 8550 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia C2 Tennen and Redmi K90 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi K90 Ultra leads Nokia C2 Tennen by 95.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C2 Tennen
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (92/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (94/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra notably outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (37/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen (78/100 vs 12/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C2 Tennen notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Ultra (60/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C2 Tennen or the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tennen by 56 points (73/100 vs 17/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C2 Tennen and the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The Nokia C2 Tennen has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the Redmi K90 Ultra — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C2 Tennen or the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The Redmi K90 Ultra leads on camera score (37/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia C2 Tennen or the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The Redmi K90 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C2 Tennen over the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The Redmi K90 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.