Nokia C2 Tava vs Redmi K90 Ultra

The Nokia C2 Tava (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Redmi K90 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 17/100 (a 56-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Ultra has the bigger battery (8550 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 50 MP; the Redmi K90 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,233,695 vs 155,362); the Redmi K90 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C2 Tava doesn't; the Nokia C2 Tava is noticeably lighter (180g vs 227g).

The Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava by 56 points (73/100 vs 17/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C2 Tava
Performance 10
Display 42
Camera 10
Battery 12
Portability 60
Value for money
Redmi K90 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 37
Battery 78
Portability 40
Value for money 82
What makes Nokia C2 Tava better?
  • Lighter: 180g vs 227g

  • Better portability (60/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Redmi K90 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3233695 vs 155362
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 300
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 486
  • Bigger battery: 8550 vs 3000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 10W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 10/100)
  • Better camera (37/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (78/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia C2 Tava vs the Redmi K90 Ultra, the Redmi K90 Ultra scores 56 points higher (73/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads (37/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava (92/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava (94/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra notably outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava (37/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava (78/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C2 Tava notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Ultra (60/100 vs 40/100).

Nokia C2 Tava: The Nokia C2 Tava is a better fit for everyday use.
Redmi K90 Ultra: The Redmi K90 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia C2 Tava Redmi K90 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio A22 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 155362 3233695
Geekbench Single 300 3041
Geekbench Multi 486 9494
Display 5.5" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1440 1280x2772
Refresh rate 165 Hz
Battery 3000 mAh 8550 mAh
Charging 10W 100W
Main camera 8 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 8 MP
Front camera 5 MP 20 MP
RAM 2GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 10 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68/IP69
Dimensions 150.6×72.4×9.1 mm 162.9×77.9×8.2 mm
Weight 180 g 227 g
Launch price $420
Camera comparison
Nokia C2 Tava
  • Main: 8MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera
Redmi K90 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera
Display comparison
Nokia C2 Tava
  • 5.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1440
  • Refresh rate: —
42
display
Redmi K90 Ultra
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1280x2772
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Nokia C2 Tava
  • 3000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
12
battery
Redmi K90 Ultra
  • 8550 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
78
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia C2 Tava and Redmi K90 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia C2 Tava MediaTek Helio A22
17/100
155362 AnTuTu
Redmi K90 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
73/100 +95.2%
3233695 AnTuTu

Redmi K90 Ultra leads Nokia C2 Tava by 95.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C2 Tava
Price unknown
Redmi K90 Ultra
$420
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava (92/100 vs 10/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava (94/100 vs 42/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra notably outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava (37/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava (78/100 vs 12/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia C2 Tava notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Ultra (60/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C2 Tava or the Redmi K90 Ultra?

The Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 Tava by 56 points (73/100 vs 17/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia C2 Tava and the Redmi K90 Ultra?

The Nokia C2 Tava has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the Redmi K90 Ultra — 73/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia C2 Tava or the Redmi K90 Ultra?

The Redmi K90 Ultra leads on camera score (37/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia C2 Tava or the Redmi K90 Ultra?

The Redmi K90 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 10/100).

Should you choose the Nokia C2 Tava over the Redmi K90 Ultra?

The Nokia C2 Tava is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi K90 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.