Nokia C2 2nd Edition vs Vivo X300 Pro
Comparing the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (2022) and the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 21/100 (a 66-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 2400); the main camera is 5 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C2 2nd Edition doesn't; the Nokia C2 2nd Edition is noticeably lighter (180g vs 226g).
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 180g vs 226g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 2400 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 5MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Nokia C2 2nd Edition vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 66 points higher (87/100 vs 21/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 15/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (84/100 vs 36/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (81/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C2 2nd Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Nokia C2 2nd Edition | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9553 | |
| Display | 5.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 480x960 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 2400 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 1GB / 2GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 154.0×75.9×10.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 226 g | |
| Price | — | $899 |
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
- 5.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 480x960
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
- 2400 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (84/100 vs 36/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (81/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C2 2nd Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C2 2nd Edition or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition by 66 points (87/100 vs 21/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C2 2nd Edition and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia C2 2nd Edition has a MobileRank rating of 21/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C2 2nd Edition or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C2 2nd Edition over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia C2 2nd Edition is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.