Nokia C2 2nd Edition vs Redmi 3S
Comparing the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (2022) and the Redmi 3S (2016) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi 3S leads — 12/100 vs 6/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi 3S has the bigger battery (4100 mAh vs 2400); the main camera is 5 MP vs 13 MP; the Redmi 3S is noticeably lighter (144g vs 180g).
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
Redmi 3S
- Overall rating 6/100
- Bigger battery: 4100 vs 2400 mAh
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 5MP
- Lighter: 144g vs 180g
- Longer battery life (14/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 75/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Nokia C2 2nd Edition vs the Redmi 3S, the Redmi 3S scores 6 points higher (12/100 vs 6/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi 3S leads (14/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 3S leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Redmi 3S is a bit better (14/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi 3S notably outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (100/100 vs 75/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 3S significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Nokia C2 2nd Edition | Redmi 3S | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 180440 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 827 | |
| Display | 5.7" IPS LCD | 5.0" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 480x960 | — | |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 2400 mAh | 4100 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 1GB / 2GB | 2GB / 3GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 16GB / 32GB | |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 154.0×75.9×10.0 mm | 139.3×69.6×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 144 g | |
| Price | — | $120 |
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Redmi 3S
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
- 5.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 480x960
- Refresh rate: —
Redmi 3S
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
- 2400 mAh
- No wireless charging
Redmi 3S
- 4100 mAh
- No wireless charging
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi 3S is a bit better (14/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi 3S notably outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (100/100 vs 75/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 3S significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C2 2nd Edition or the Redmi 3S?
The Redmi 3S edges out the Nokia C2 2nd Edition by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia C2 2nd Edition and the Redmi 3S?
The Nokia C2 2nd Edition has a MobileRank rating of 6/100, the Redmi 3S — 12/100.
Should you choose the Nokia C2 2nd Edition over the Redmi 3S?
The Nokia C2 2nd Edition is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi 3S is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.