Nokia C12 vs Vivo Y32t
The Nokia C12 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A1, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 11/100 vs 6/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 13 MP.
Nokia C12
Vivo Y32t
- Lighter: 177g vs 179g
- Better design/ergonomics (78/100 vs 76/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 8MP
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia C12 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 5 points higher (11/100 vs 6/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia C12 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (78/100 vs 76/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C12 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9863A1 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | — | |
| Display | 6.3" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 160.6×74.3×8.8 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 177 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C12
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Nokia C12
- 6.3" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Nokia C12
- 3000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia C12 (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia C12 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (78/100 vs 76/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C12 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Nokia C12 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia C12 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Nokia C12 has a MobileRank rating of 6/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Should you choose the Nokia C12 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Nokia C12 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.