Nokia C100 vs Vivo Y32t
The Nokia C100 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 11/100 vs 7/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 13 MP.
Nokia C100
Vivo Y32t
- Overall rating 7/100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 8MP
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 12/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Nokia C100 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 4 points higher (11/100 vs 7/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Nokia C100 (36/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Nokia C100 (76/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C100 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio A22 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | — | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | — | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C100
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Nokia C100
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Nokia C100
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Nokia C100 (36/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Nokia C100 (76/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C100 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Nokia C100 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia C100 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Nokia C100 has a MobileRank rating of 7/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Should you choose the Nokia C100 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Nokia C100 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.