Nokia C100 vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11
The Nokia C100 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads — 76/100 vs 18/100 (a 58-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is faster in AnTuTu (3,154,662 vs 155,362).
Nokia C100
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- Overall rating 18/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3154662 vs 155362
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 486
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 10/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Nokia C100 vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 scores 58 points higher (76/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (92/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (35/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (92/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Nokia C100 (92/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Nokia C100 (99/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Nokia C100 (35/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Nokia C100 (92/100 vs 32/100).
| Specification | Nokia C100 | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio A22 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | 3154662 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | 9494 | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 120W | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | — | |
| Weight | — | 210 g | |
| Price | — | $400 |
Nokia C100
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C100
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nokia C100
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- 7500 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Nokia C100 and Vivo iQOO Neo 11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads Nokia C100 by 95.1% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia C100
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Nokia C100 (92/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Nokia C100 (99/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Nokia C100 (35/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Nokia C100 (92/100 vs 32/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C100 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Nokia C100 by 58 points (76/100 vs 18/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C100 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Nokia C100 has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — 76/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C100 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads on camera score (35/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia C100 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads on performance (92/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C100 over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Nokia C100 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.