Nokia C02 vs Vivo X500 Pro
The Nokia C02 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9832E, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 22/100 (a 68-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 5 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X500 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C02 doesn't; the Vivo X500 Pro is thinner (8.1mm vs 10.0mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C02
Vivo X500 Pro
What makes Nokia C02 better?
- Lighter: 191g vs 192g
- Overall rating 22/100
What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 5MP
- Better camera (87/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 42/100)
- Better portability (63/100 vs 48/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia C02 vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 68 points higher (90/100 vs 22/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 15/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (94/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (87/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (81/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia C02 (63/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia C02 | Vivo X500 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9832E | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | — | 5016623 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 4188 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 13145 | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.4" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 1216x2660 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 148.7×71.2×10.0 mm | 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | $970 |
Camera comparison
Nokia C02
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Vivo X500 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Nokia C02
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2660
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia C02
- 3000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C02
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (94/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (87/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (81/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia C02 (63/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 by 68 points (90/100 vs 22/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C02 and the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Nokia C02 has a MobileRank rating of 22/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C02 over the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.