Nokia 8 vs Vivo Y50
The Nokia 8 (2017) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835, while the Vivo Y50 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y50 leads — 31/100 vs 29/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y50 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3090); the Nokia 8 is faster in AnTuTu (438,016 vs 329,457); the Nokia 8 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y50 doesn't; the Nokia 8 is noticeably lighter (160g vs 197g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 8
Vivo Y50
What makes Nokia 8 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 438016 vs 329457
- Better Geekbench Single: 427 vs 321
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1500 vs 1128
- Faster charging: 18W vs 15W
- Lighter: 160g vs 197g
- Higher performance (33/100 vs 24/100)
- Better portability (84/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Vivo Y50 better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3090 mAh
- Better camera (16/100 vs 12/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (58/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia 8 vs the Vivo Y50, the Vivo Y50 scores 2 points higher (31/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y50 leads (43/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia 8 is a bit better (33/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y50 is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y50 and the Nokia 8 are nearly equal (16/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y50 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 (43/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 8 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y50 (84/100 vs 49/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia 8 | Vivo Y50 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | |
| AnTuTu | 438016 | 329457 | |
| Geekbench Single | 427 | 321 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1500 | 1128 | |
| Display | 5.3" IPS LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 3090 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 7.1 | Android 10.0; Funtouch 10.0 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 151.5×73.7×7.9 mm | 162.0×76.5×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 160 g | 197 g | |
| Launch price | $699 | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia 8
- Main: 13MP f/2.0
- Front: 13MP
Vivo Y50
- Main: 13MP f/2.2
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Nokia 8
- 5.3" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2560x1440
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo Y50
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Nokia 8
- 3090 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y50
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia 8 and Vivo Y50, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia 8 leads Vivo Y50 by 33.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y50
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia 8 is a bit better (33/100 vs 24/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y50 is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y50 and the Nokia 8 are nearly equal (16/100 vs 12/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y50 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 (43/100 vs 12/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia 8 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y50 (84/100 vs 49/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 8 or the Vivo Y50?
The Vivo Y50 edges out the Nokia 8 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia 8 and the Vivo Y50?
The Nokia 8 has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the Vivo Y50 — 31/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia 8 or the Vivo Y50?
The Nokia 8 leads on performance (33/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 8 over the Vivo Y50?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Nokia 8 (84/100 vs 49/100).