Nokia 8 vs Nokia C100
The Nokia 8 (2017) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835, while the Nokia C100 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia 8 leads — 29/100 vs 18/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia C100 has the bigger battery (4000 mAh vs 3090); the main camera is 13 MP vs 8 MP; the Nokia 8 is faster in AnTuTu (438,016 vs 155,362); the Nokia 8 has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C100 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 8
Nokia C100
What makes Nokia 8 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 438016 vs 155362
- Better Geekbench Single: 427 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1500 vs 486
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 8MP
- Higher performance (33/100 vs 10/100)
- Better camera (12/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (52/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Nokia C100 better?
- Bigger battery: 4000 vs 3090 mAh
- Longer battery life (32/100 vs 12/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia 8 vs the Nokia C100, the Nokia 8 scores 11 points higher (29/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia 8 leads (33/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia C100 leads (32/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia 8 notably outperforms the Nokia C100 (33/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia 8 is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 and the Nokia C100 are nearly equal (12/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia C100 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 (32/100 vs 12/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia 8 | Nokia C100 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 | MediaTek Helio A22 | |
| AnTuTu | 438016 | 155362 | |
| Geekbench Single | 427 | 300 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1500 | 486 | |
| Display | 5.3" IPS LCD | 5.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 720x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 3090 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 3GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 7.1 | Android 12 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 151.5×73.7×7.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 160 g | — | |
| Launch price | $699 | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia 8
- Main: 13MP f/2.0
- Front: 13MP
Nokia C100
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Nokia 8
- 5.3" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2560x1440
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Nokia C100
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Nokia 8
- 3090 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Nokia C100
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia 8 and Nokia C100, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia 8 leads Nokia C100 by 181.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C100
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia 8 notably outperforms the Nokia C100 (33/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia 8 is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 and the Nokia C100 are nearly equal (12/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nokia C100 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 (32/100 vs 12/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 8 or the Nokia C100?
The Nokia 8 is noticeably better than the Nokia C100 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia 8 and the Nokia C100?
The Nokia 8 has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the Nokia C100 — 18/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia 8 or the Nokia C100?
The Nokia 8 leads on performance (33/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 8 over the Nokia C100?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is performance — better on the Nokia 8 (33/100 vs 10/100).