Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs Vivo T2 Pro
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, while the Vivo T2 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo T2 Pro leads — 33/100 vs 18/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo T2 Pro has the bigger battery (4600 mAh vs 4500); the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo T2 Pro doesn't; the Vivo T2 Pro is noticeably lighter (175g vs 230g).
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
Vivo T2 Pro
- Better camera (45/100 vs 37/100)
- Bigger battery: 4600 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 18W
- Lighter: 175g vs 230g
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (81/100 vs 12/100)
Comparing the Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs the Vivo T2 Pro, the Vivo T2 Pro scores 15 points higher (33/100 vs 18/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo T2 Pro leads (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo T2 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a bit better (45/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo T2 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo T2 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (81/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia 8 V 5G UW | Vivo T2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | |
| AnTuTu | 597974 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 799 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1836 | — | |
| Display | 6.0" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 66W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 24 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×78.6×9.0 mm | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 175 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 24MP
Vivo T2 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- 6.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo T2 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo T2 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo T2 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a bit better (45/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo T2 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo T2 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (81/100 vs 12/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Vivo T2 Pro?
The Vivo T2 Pro is noticeably better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia 8 V 5G UW and the Vivo T2 Pro?
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Vivo T2 Pro — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Vivo T2 Pro?
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads on camera score (45/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 8 V 5G UW over the Vivo T2 Pro?
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo T2 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.