Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs Samsung Galaxy A26

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, while the Samsung Galaxy A26 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1380. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A26 leads — 32/100 vs 18/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A26 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A26 is faster in AnTuTu (749,719 vs 597,974); the Samsung Galaxy A26 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 230g).

The Samsung Galaxy A26 is noticeably better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 45
Battery 24
Design 12
Value for money 55
Samsung Galaxy A26
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 29
Battery 37
Design 50
Value for money 97
What makes Nokia 8 V 5G UW better?
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP

  • Better camera (45/100 vs 29/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A26 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 749719 vs 597974
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1008 vs 799
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2758 vs 1836
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 25W vs 18W
  • Lighter: 200g vs 230g

  • Longer battery life (37/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better value for money (97/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs the Samsung Galaxy A26, the Samsung Galaxy A26 scores 14 points higher (32/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads (45/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 leads (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 leads (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (45/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (50/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (97/100 vs 55/100).

Nokia 8 V 5G UW: The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy A26: The Samsung Galaxy A26 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia 8 V 5G UW Samsung Galaxy A26
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G Exynos 1380
AnTuTu 597974 749719
Geekbench Single 799 1008
Geekbench Multi 1836 2758
Display 6.0" IPS LCD 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1080x2340
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W 25W
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 8 MP
Front camera 24 MP 13 MP
RAM 6GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 64GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 10 Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7
NFC yes yes
Protection IP67
Dimensions 171.9×78.6×9.0 mm 164.0×77.5×7.7 mm
Weight 230 g 200 g
Price $182
Camera comparison
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 24MP
45
camera
Samsung Galaxy A26
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
29
camera
Display comparison
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
  • 6.0" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: —
0
display
Samsung Galaxy A26
  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
24
battery
Samsung Galaxy A26
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
37
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia 8 V 5G UW and Samsung Galaxy A26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia 8 V 5G UW Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
18/100
597974 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A26 Exynos 1380
32/100 +20.2%
749719 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy A26 leads Nokia 8 V 5G UW by 20.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
Price unknown
Samsung Galaxy A26
$182
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (45/100 vs 29/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (50/100 vs 12/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (97/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Samsung Galaxy A26?

The Samsung Galaxy A26 is noticeably better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the Nokia 8 V 5G UW and the Samsung Galaxy A26?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Samsung Galaxy A26 — 32/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Samsung Galaxy A26?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads on camera score (45/100 vs 29/100).

Should you choose the Nokia 8 V 5G UW over the Samsung Galaxy A26?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A26 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.