Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs Samsung Galaxy A26

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, while the Samsung Galaxy A26 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1380. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A26 leads — 50/100 vs 45/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A26 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A26 is faster in AnTuTu (754,064 vs 597,974); the Samsung Galaxy A26 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 230g).

The Samsung Galaxy A26 edges out the Nokia 8 V 5G UW by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Nokia 8 V 5G UW

Performance 44
Display 63
Camera 47
Battery 33
Portability 30
Value for money —

Samsung Galaxy A26

Performance 52
Display 79
Camera 34
Battery 44
Portability 63
Value for money 50

What makes Nokia 8 V 5G UW better?

  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP

  • Better camera (47/100 vs 34/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy A26 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 754064 vs 597974
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1008 vs 799
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2710 vs 1836
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 25W vs 18W
  • Lighter: 200g vs 230g

  • Higher performance (52/100 vs 44/100)
  • Longer battery life (44/100 vs 33/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better portability (63/100 vs 30/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs the Samsung Galaxy A26, the Samsung Galaxy A26 scores 5 points higher (50/100 vs 45/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads (47/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 leads (44/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (79/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a bit better (47/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 is a bit better (44/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (63/100 vs 30/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Nokia 8 V 5G UW Samsung Galaxy A26
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G Exynos 1380
AnTuTu 597974 754064
Geekbench Single 799 1008
Geekbench Multi 1836 2710
Display 6.0" IPS LCD 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1080x2340
Refresh rate — 120 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W 25W
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 8 MP
Front camera 24 MP 13 MP
RAM 6GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 64GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 10 Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7
Brightness (peak) — 1000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP67
Dimensions 171.9×78.6×9.0 mm 164.0×77.5×7.7 mm
Weight 230 g 200 g
Launch price — $250

Camera comparison

Nokia 8 V 5G UW

  • Main: 64MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 24MP
47
camera

Samsung Galaxy A26

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
34
camera

Display comparison

Nokia 8 V 5G UW

  • 6.0" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: —
63
display

Samsung Galaxy A26

  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Battery and charging

Nokia 8 V 5G UW

  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
33
battery

Samsung Galaxy A26

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Nokia 8 V 5G UW and Samsung Galaxy A26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia 8 V 5G UW Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
45/100
597974 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A26 Exynos 1380
50/100 +20.7%
754064 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy A26 leads Nokia 8 V 5G UW by 20.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Nokia 8 V 5G UW

Price unknown

Samsung Galaxy A26

$250

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (79/100 vs 63/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a bit better (47/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 is a bit better (44/100 vs 33/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (63/100 vs 30/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Samsung Galaxy A26?

The Samsung Galaxy A26 edges out the Nokia 8 V 5G UW by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Nokia 8 V 5G UW and the Samsung Galaxy A26?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Samsung Galaxy A26 — 50/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Samsung Galaxy A26?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads on camera score (47/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Samsung Galaxy A26?

The Samsung Galaxy A26 leads on performance (52/100 vs 44/100).

Should you choose the Nokia 8 V 5G UW over the Samsung Galaxy A26?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Samsung Galaxy A26 (63/100 vs 30/100).