Nokia 5.3 vs Oppo A52
The Nokia 5.3 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, while the Oppo A52 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo A52 leads — 31/100 vs 23/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo A52 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 12 MP; the Nokia 5.3 has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo A52 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 5.3
Oppo A52
What makes Nokia 5.3 better?
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 12MP
- Lighter: 185g vs 192g
- Better portability (62/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Oppo A52 better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 18W vs 10W
- Better camera (16/100 vs 12/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 22/100)
- Better display (58/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia 5.3 vs the Oppo A52, the Oppo A52 scores 8 points higher (31/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo A52 leads (43/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo A52 notably outperforms the Nokia 5.3 (58/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo A52 and the Nokia 5.3 are nearly equal (16/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo A52 notably outperforms the Nokia 5.3 (43/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 5.3 is a bit better (62/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia 5.3 | Oppo A52 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | |
| AnTuTu | 329457 | 329457 | |
| Geekbench Single | 321 | 321 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1128 | 1128 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LTPS IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB / 6GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10.0; ColorOS 7.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 450 nits | 480 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×76.6×8.5 mm | 162.0×75.5×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $199 | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia 5.3
- Main: 13MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Oppo A52
- Main: 12MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Nokia 5.3
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Oppo A52
- 6.5" LTPS IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Nokia 5.3
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Oppo A52
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia 5.3 and Oppo A52, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo A52
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo A52 notably outperforms the Nokia 5.3 (58/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo A52 and the Nokia 5.3 are nearly equal (16/100 vs 12/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo A52 notably outperforms the Nokia 5.3 (43/100 vs 22/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia 5.3 is a bit better (62/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 5.3 or the Oppo A52?
The Oppo A52 edges out the Nokia 5.3 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia 5.3 and the Oppo A52?
The Nokia 5.3 has a MobileRank rating of 23/100, the Oppo A52 — 31/100.
Should you choose the Nokia 5.3 over the Oppo A52?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Oppo A52 (58/100 vs 32/100).