Nokia 300 Charge vs Vivo iQOO 16
A full comparison of the Nokia 300 Charge and the Vivo iQOO 16 is not possible yet: there is too little verified data on the Nokia 300 Charge to compute a MobileRank score. The specs we do have are in the table below.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 300 Charge
Performance
—
Display
30
Camera
—
Battery
15
Portability
68
Value for money
—
Vivo iQOO 16
Performance
100
Display
99
Camera
78
Battery
90
Portability
42
Value for money
92
What makes Nokia 300 Charge better?
- Lighter: 138g vs 223g
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 3700 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 10W
Comparison verdict
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia 300 Charge | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 12873 | |
| Display | 2.4" | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 240x320 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 3700 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | — | 32 MP | |
| RAM | — | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | — | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 136.6×55.0×15.0 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 138 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Nokia 300 Charge
- Main: —
- Front: —
—
cameraVivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
78
cameraDisplay comparison
Nokia 300 Charge
- 2.4"
- Resolution: 240x320
- Refresh rate: —
30
displayVivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
99
displayBattery and charging
Nokia 300 Charge
- 3700 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
15
batteryVivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
90
battery