Nokia 3 vs Vivo Y32t
The Nokia 3 (2017) runs on the MediaTek MT6737, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 11/100 vs 9/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 2630); the main camera is 8 MP vs 13 MP; the Nokia 3 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Nokia 3 is noticeably lighter (140g vs 179g).
Nokia 3
Vivo Y32t
- Lighter: 140g vs 179g
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 76/100)
- Better value for money (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 2630 mAh
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 8MP
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia 3 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 2 points higher (11/100 vs 9/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 3 leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia 3 (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia 3 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 76/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 3 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (99/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Nokia 3 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek MT6737 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 40000 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 420 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1200 | — | |
| Display | 5.0" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1280x720 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 2630 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 5W | — | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | — | |
| Storage | 16GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 7.0 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 143.4×71.4×8.5 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 140 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $159 | — |
Nokia 3
- Main: 8MP f/2.0
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Nokia 3
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1280x720
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Nokia 3
- 2630 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia 3 (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia 3 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 76/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 3 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (99/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Nokia 3 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Nokia 3 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia 3 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Nokia 3 has a MobileRank rating of 9/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Should you choose the Nokia 3 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Nokia 3 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.