Nokia 3 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Nokia 3 (2017) runs on the MediaTek MT6737, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $159 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 14/100 (a 73-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 2630); the main camera is 8 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 73,398); the Nokia 3 is noticeably lighter (140g vs 226g).
Nokia 3
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 140g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $159 vs $899
- Better portability (78/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 73398
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 141
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 594
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 2630 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 34/100)
Comparing the Nokia 3 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 73 points higher (87/100 vs 14/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Nokia 3 — 2/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3 (93/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3 (84/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3 (81/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 3 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Nokia 3 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek MT6737 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 73398 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 141 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 594 | 9553 | |
| Display | 5.0" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x720 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 2630 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 5W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 16GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 7.0 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 143.4×71.4×8.5 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 140 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $159 | $899 |
Nokia 3
- Main: 8MP f/2.0
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia 3
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1280x720
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia 3
- 2630 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Nokia 3 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Nokia 3 by 97.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $740. Nokia 3 was $740 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3 (93/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3 (84/100 vs 34/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3 (81/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia 3 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Nokia 3 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3 by 73 points (87/100 vs 14/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia 3 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia 3 has a MobileRank rating of 14/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia 3 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia 3 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 3 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia 3 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.