Nokia 3.4 vs Oppo A32
The Nokia 3.4 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, while the Oppo A32 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo A32 leads — 26/100 vs 22/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo A32 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the Nokia 3.4 has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo A32 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 3.4
Oppo A32
What makes Nokia 3.4 better?
- Lighter: 180g vs 186g
- Better camera (12/100 vs 10/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Oppo A32 better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 18W vs 10W
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 22/100)
- Better display (44/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia 3.4 vs the Oppo A32, the Oppo A32 scores 4 points higher (26/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo A32 leads (43/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 18/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo A32 is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 3.4 and the Oppo A32 are nearly equal (12/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo A32 notably outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (43/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 3.4 and the Oppo A32 are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia 3.4 | Oppo A32 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 | |
| AnTuTu | 251428 | 251428 | |
| Geekbench Single | 272 | 272 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 992 | 992 | |
| Display | 6.4" IPS LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1560 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 4GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 10, planned upgrade to Android 11 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | 480 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×76.0×8.7 mm | 163.9×75.1×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 186 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia 3.4
- Main: 13MP
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Oppo A32
- Main: 13MP f/2.2
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Nokia 3.4
- 6.4" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Oppo A32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia 3.4
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Oppo A32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia 3.4 and Oppo A32, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 18/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo A32 is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia 3.4 and the Oppo A32 are nearly equal (12/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo A32 notably outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (43/100 vs 22/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia 3.4 and the Oppo A32 are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 3.4 or the Oppo A32?
The Oppo A32 edges out the Nokia 3.4 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia 3.4 and the Oppo A32?
The Nokia 3.4 has a MobileRank rating of 22/100, the Oppo A32 — 26/100.
Should you choose the Nokia 3.4 over the Oppo A32?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Oppo A32 (43/100 vs 22/100).