Nokia 3.4 vs Oppo A32
The Nokia 3.4 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, while the Oppo A32 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo A32 leads — 17/100 vs 8/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo A32 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the Nokia 3.4 has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo A32 doesn't.
Nokia 3.4
Oppo A32
- Lighter: 180g vs 186g
- Better camera (2/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (75/100 vs 67/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 18W vs 10W
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia 3.4 vs the Oppo A32, the Oppo A32 scores 9 points higher (17/100 vs 8/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo A32 leads (36/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo A32 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 3.4 and the Oppo A32 are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo A32 notably outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (36/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia 3.4 is a bit better (75/100 vs 67/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia 3.4 | Oppo A32 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 | |
| AnTuTu | 251428 | 251428 | |
| Geekbench Single | 272 | 272 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 992 | 992 | |
| Display | 6.4" IPS LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1560 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 4GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 10, planned upgrade to Android 11 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | 480 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×76.0×8.7 mm | 163.9×75.1×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 186 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia 3.4
- Main: 13MP
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Oppo A32
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 8MP
Nokia 3.4
- 6.4" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Oppo A32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia 3.4
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Oppo A32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia 3.4 and Oppo A32, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo A32 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia 3.4 and the Oppo A32 are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo A32 notably outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (36/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia 3.4 is a bit better (75/100 vs 67/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia 3.4 or the Oppo A32?
The Oppo A32 edges out the Nokia 3.4 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia 3.4 and the Oppo A32?
The Nokia 3.4 has a MobileRank rating of 8/100, the Oppo A32 — 17/100.
Should you choose the Nokia 3.4 over the Oppo A32?
The Nokia 3.4 is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo A32 is a better fit for everyday use.