Nokia 2780 Flip vs ZTE Blade A76 4G
The Nokia 2780 Flip (2022) is priced at $90, the ZTE Blade A76 4G (2025) at $105. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade A76 4G leads — 25/100 vs 10/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A76 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 1450); the main camera is 5 MP vs 50 MP.
Nokia 2780 Flip
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Cheaper: $90 vs $105
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 1450 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 5MP
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia 2780 Flip vs the ZTE Blade A76 4G, the ZTE Blade A76 4G scores 15 points higher (25/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 2780 Flip (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G notably outperforms the Nokia 2780 Flip (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 2780 Flip (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia 2780 Flip significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Nokia 2780 Flip | ZTE Blade A76 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 2.7" TFT LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 240x320 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 1450 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 5W | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | — | — | |
| RAM | — | 4GB | |
| Storage | — | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | KaiOS 3.1 | Android 15 | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 202.1×58.0×11.5 mm | — | |
| Weight | 131 g | — | |
| Price | $90 | $105 |
Nokia 2780 Flip
- Main: 5MP
- Front: —
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Main: 50MP
- Front: —
Nokia 2780 Flip
- 2.7" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 240x320
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia 2780 Flip
- 1450 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Price difference: $15. Nokia 2780 Flip is cheaper by $15.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 2780 Flip (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G notably outperforms the Nokia 2780 Flip (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 2780 Flip (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia 2780 Flip significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (100/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Nokia 2780 Flip or the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The ZTE Blade A76 4G is noticeably better than the Nokia 2780 Flip — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia 2780 Flip and the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Nokia 2780 Flip has a MobileRank rating of 10/100, the ZTE Blade A76 4G — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia 2780 Flip or the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The ZTE Blade A76 4G leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 2780 Flip over the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Nokia 2780 Flip is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade A76 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.