Nokia 2.2 vs Vivo Y32t

The Nokia 2.2 (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 11/100 vs 7/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3000); the Nokia 2.2 is noticeably lighter (153g vs 179g).

The Vivo Y32t edges out the Nokia 2.2 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 2.2
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 0
Battery 0
Design 100
Value for money 55
Vivo Y32t
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 0
Battery 36
Design 76
Value for money 55
What makes Nokia 2.2 better?
  • Lighter: 153g vs 179g

  • Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 76/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3000 mAh

  • Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia 2.2 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 4 points higher (11/100 vs 7/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.2 (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia 2.2 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 76/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.

Nokia 2.2: The Nokia 2.2 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo Y32t: The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia 2.2 Vivo Y32t
Processor MediaTek Helio A22 MediaTek Helio P70 ()
AnTuTu 155362
Geekbench Single 300
Geekbench Multi 486
Display 5.7" IPS LCD 6.5" LCD IPS
Resolution 720x1520 720x1600
Refresh rate
Battery 3000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging
Main camera 13 MP 13 MP
Front camera 5 MP 8 MP
RAM 2GB
Storage 16GB / 32GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 9.0 (Pie); Android One Android 11 Red Velvet Cake
NFC no no
Dimensions 146.0×70.6×9.3 mm 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm
Weight 153 g 179 g
Price
Camera comparison
Nokia 2.2
  • Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
  • Front: 5MP
0
camera
Vivo Y32t
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 8MP
0
camera
Display comparison
Nokia 2.2
  • 5.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1520
  • Refresh rate: —
0
display
Vivo Y32t
  • 6.5" LCD IPS
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
0
display
Battery and charging
Nokia 2.2
  • 3000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
0
battery
Vivo Y32t
  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
36
battery
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia 2.2 (36/100 vs 0/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Nokia 2.2 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 76/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 2.2 or the Vivo Y32t?

The Vivo Y32t edges out the Nokia 2.2 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Nokia 2.2 and the Vivo Y32t?

The Nokia 2.2 has a MobileRank rating of 7/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.

Should you choose the Nokia 2.2 over the Vivo Y32t?

The Nokia 2.2 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.