Motorola Signature vs Oppo A32
The Motorola Signature (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Oppo A32 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Signature leads — 86/100 vs 26/100 (a 60-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Signature has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Signature is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 251,428); the Motorola Signature has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo A32 doesn't; the Motorola Signature is thinner (7.0mm vs 8.4mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Signature
Oppo A32
What makes Motorola Signature better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 251428
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 272
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 992
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 18/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 44/100)
- Better portability (78/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Oppo A32 better?
- Overall rating 26/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Signature vs the Oppo A32, the Motorola Signature scores 60 points higher (86/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature leads (90/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature leads (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature leads (77/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Oppo A32 (90/100 vs 18/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Oppo A32 (84/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Oppo A32 (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Oppo A32 (77/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Oppo A32 (78/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Signature | Oppo A32 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 251428 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 272 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 992 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 18W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 480 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×76.4×7.0 mm | 163.9×75.1×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 186 g | |
| Launch price | $699 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Signature
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Oppo A32
- Main: 13MP f/2.2
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Signature
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo A32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Signature
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Oppo A32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Signature and Oppo A32, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Signature leads Oppo A32 by 1115.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo A32
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Oppo A32 (90/100 vs 18/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Oppo A32 (84/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Oppo A32 (91/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Oppo A32 (77/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Oppo A32 (78/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Signature or the Oppo A32?
The Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Oppo A32 by 60 points (86/100 vs 26/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Signature and the Oppo A32?
The Motorola Signature has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Oppo A32 — 26/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Signature or the Oppo A32?
The Motorola Signature leads on camera score (91/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Signature or the Oppo A32?
The Motorola Signature leads on performance (90/100 vs 18/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Signature over the Oppo A32?
The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.