Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs Realme GT 8 Pro

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Realme GT 8 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1299 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme GT 8 Pro leads — 84/100 vs 77/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Realme GT 8 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4700); the Realme GT 8 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,119,308).

The Realme GT 8 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 60
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 62
Realme GT 8 Pro
Performance 98
Display 84
Camera 73
Battery 83
Portability 52
Value for money 80
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 207g

  • Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Realme GT 8 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3119308
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3041
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9494
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Cheaper: $599 vs $1299

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 92/100)
  • Better camera (73/100 vs 60/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better value for money (80/100 vs 62/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs the Realme GT 8 Pro, the Realme GT 8 Pro scores 7 points higher (84/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro leads (73/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro leads (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro leads (80/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro is a bit better (98/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro is a bit better (73/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 notably outperforms the Realme GT 8 Pro (68/100 vs 52/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (80/100 vs 62/100).

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025: The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Realme GT 8 Pro: The Realme GT 8 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 Realme GT 8 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3119308 3942923
Geekbench Single 3041 3640
Geekbench Multi 9494 11033
Display 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2912 2780x1264
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 68W 100W
Wireless charging 30W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 16 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm
Weight 199 g 207 g
Price $1299 $599
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Realme GT 8 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
73
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
  • 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
Realme GT 8 Pro
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2780x1264
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery
Realme GT 8 Pro
  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless charging: no data
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 and Realme GT 8 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
77/100
3119308 AnTuTu
Realme GT 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100 +20.9%
3942923 AnTuTu

Realme GT 8 Pro leads Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 by 20.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
$1299
Realme GT 8 Pro
$599

Price difference: $700. Realme GT 8 Pro is cheaper by $700.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro is a bit better (98/100 vs 92/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro is a bit better (73/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (83/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 notably outperforms the Realme GT 8 Pro (68/100 vs 52/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (80/100 vs 62/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 or the Realme GT 8 Pro?

The Realme GT 8 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 and the Realme GT 8 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Realme GT 8 Pro — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 or the Realme GT 8 Pro?

The Realme GT 8 Pro leads on camera score (73/100 vs 60/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 or the Realme GT 8 Pro?

The Realme GT 8 Pro leads on performance (98/100 vs 92/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 over the Realme GT 8 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Realme GT 8 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.