Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Poco F7 Ultra

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Poco F7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1099 and $500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 71/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Ultra has the bigger battery (5300 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 2,931,492); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.4mm).

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra edges out the Poco F7 Ultra by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 58
Battery 51
Design 51
Value for money 34
Poco F7 Ultra
Performance 67
Display 100
Camera 67
Battery 76
Design 35
Value for money 75
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 2931492
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3050
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9300
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 212g

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 67/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Poco F7 Ultra better?
  • Bigger battery: 5300 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 68W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
  • Cheaper: $500 vs $1099

  • Better camera (67/100 vs 58/100)
  • Longer battery life (76/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better value for money (75/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Poco F7 Ultra, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 2 points higher (73/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (75/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (92/100 vs 67/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (67/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (51/100 vs 35/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (75/100 vs 34/100).

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Poco F7 Ultra: The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Poco F7 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 3942923 2931492
Geekbench Single 3640 3050
Geekbench Multi 11033 9300
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2992 3200x1440
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5300 mAh
Charging 68W 120W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 32 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 3200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm
Weight 199 g 212 g
Price $1099 $500
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
58
camera
Poco F7 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 32MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
67
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
100
display
Poco F7 Ultra
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
Poco F7 Ultra
  • 5300 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 11:39 hrs, total 26:17 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
76
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Poco F7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
73/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100 -34.5%
2931492 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Poco F7 Ultra by 34.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
$1099
Poco F7 Ultra
$500

Price difference: $599. Poco F7 Ultra is cheaper by $599.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (92/100 vs 67/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (67/100 vs 58/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (76/100 vs 51/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (51/100 vs 35/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (75/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Poco F7 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra edges out the Poco F7 Ultra by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Poco F7 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Poco F7 Ultra — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Poco F7 Ultra?

The Poco F7 Ultra leads on camera score (67/100 vs 58/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Poco F7 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 67/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Poco F7 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.