Motorola Razr 70+ vs Redmi K90 Pro Max

The Motorola Razr 70+ (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Redmi K90 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $561. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads — 86/100 vs 67/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 4500); the Redmi K90 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (4,119,955 vs 1,801,694); the Motorola Razr 70+ is noticeably lighter (189g vs 210g).

The Redmi K90 Pro Max is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 70+ — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70+
Performance 75
Display 91
Camera 57
Battery 46
Portability 75
Value for money 46
Redmi K90 Pro Max
Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 78
Battery 89
Portability 54
Value for money 90
What makes Motorola Razr 70+ better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 189g vs 210g

  • Better display (91/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (75/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Redmi K90 Pro Max better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4119955 vs 1801694
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1930
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4817
  • Bigger battery: 7560 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $561 vs $1099

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (89/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 70+ vs the Redmi K90 Pro Max, the Redmi K90 Pro Max scores 19 points higher (86/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (98/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (78/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70+ — 46/100, Redmi K90 Pro Max — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (98/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70+ is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (78/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (89/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70+ notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Pro Max (75/100 vs 54/100).

Motorola Razr 70+: The Motorola Razr 70+ is a better fit for active users.
Redmi K90 Pro Max: The Redmi K90 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 70+ Redmi K90 Pro Max
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1801694 4119955
Geekbench Single 1930 3640
Geekbench Multi 4817 11033
Display 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.9" OLED
Resolution 1084x2640 2608x1200
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 7560 mAh
Charging 45W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.4×74.0×7.1 mm 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm
Weight 189 g 210 g
Launch price $1099 $561
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70+
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera
Redmi K90 Pro Max
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70+
  • 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1084x2640
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
91
display
Redmi K90 Pro Max
  • 6.9" OLED
  • Resolution: 2608x1200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70+
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
46
battery
Redmi K90 Pro Max
  • 7560 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
89
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 70+ and Redmi K90 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 70+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
67/100
1801694 AnTuTu
Redmi K90 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
86/100 +56.3%
4119955 AnTuTu

Redmi K90 Pro Max leads Motorola Razr 70+ by 56.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 70+
$1099
Redmi K90 Pro Max
$561

Launch price difference: $538. Redmi K90 Pro Max was $538 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (98/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70+ is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (78/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (89/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70+ notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Pro Max (75/100 vs 54/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70+ or the Redmi K90 Pro Max?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 70+ — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70+ and the Redmi K90 Pro Max?

The Motorola Razr 70+ has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Redmi K90 Pro Max — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70+ or the Redmi K90 Pro Max?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max leads on camera score (78/100 vs 57/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70+ or the Redmi K90 Pro Max?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max leads on performance (98/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70+ over the Redmi K90 Pro Max?

The Motorola Razr 70+ is a better fit for active users. The Redmi K90 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.