Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Max

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi 17 Max (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Max leads — 88/100 vs 76/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Max has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,654,776 vs 2,962,094); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 219g).

The Xiaomi 17 Max is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

Performance 91
Display 94
Camera 57
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 62

Xiaomi 17 Max

Performance 97
Display 81
Camera 90
Battery 90
Portability 40
Value for money 90

What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?

  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 219g

  • Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 40/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3654776 vs 2962094
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
  • Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $1099

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better camera (90/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (90/100 vs 58/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 17 Max, the Xiaomi 17 Max scores 12 points higher (88/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max leads (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max leads (90/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Xiaomi 17 Max — 90/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max is a bit better (97/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Max (68/100 vs 40/100).

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Xiaomi 17 Max: The Xiaomi 17 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Xiaomi 17 Max
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2962094 3654776
Geekbench Single 3013 3639
Geekbench Multi 9287 11047
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2912 2608x1200
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 8000 mAh
Charging 68W 100W
Wireless charging 30W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm —
Weight 199 g 219 g
Launch price $1099 $799

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera

Xiaomi 17 Max

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
90
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display

Xiaomi 17 Max

  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2608x1200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery

Xiaomi 17 Max

  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
90
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
2962094 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
88/100 +19.0%
3654776 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Max leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 19.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

$1099

Xiaomi 17 Max

$799

Launch price difference: $300. Xiaomi 17 Max was $300 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max is a bit better (97/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (90/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (90/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Max (68/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Max is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Max?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Xiaomi 17 Max — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Max leads on camera score (90/100 vs 57/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Max leads on performance (97/100 vs 91/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Xiaomi 17 Max?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 17 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.