Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Redmi 4A
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Redmi 4A (2016) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 425; launch prices were $1099 and $100. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 17/100 (a 59-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 3120); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 180,934); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 4A doesn't; the Redmi 4A is noticeably lighter (131g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Redmi 4A
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 180934
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 130
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 488
- Bigger battery: 4700 vs 3120 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 10/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 32/100)
What makes Redmi 4A better?
- Lighter: 131g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $1099
- Better portability (78/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Redmi 4A, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 59 points higher (76/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Redmi 4A — 22/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (94/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (57/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (58/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi 4A is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Redmi 4A | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 180934 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 130 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 488 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 5.0" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 3120 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 16GB / 32GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 139.9×70.4×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 131 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $100 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi 4A
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Redmi 4A
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Redmi 4A
- 3120 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Redmi 4A, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Redmi 4A by 1537.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $999. Redmi 4A was $999 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (91/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (94/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (57/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (58/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi 4A is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Redmi 4A?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A by 59 points (76/100 vs 17/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Redmi 4A?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Redmi 4A — 17/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Redmi 4A?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Redmi 4A?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Redmi 4A?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.