Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs OnePlus Ace 5 Racing

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400e; estimated prices are $1099 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 66/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 2,545,677).

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 57
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 64
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
Performance 84
Display 79
Camera 32
Battery 68
Portability 57
Value for money 84
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 2545677
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2233
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 7478
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 200g

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better camera (57/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 57/100)
What makes OnePlus Ace 5 Racing better?
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
  • Cheaper: $250 vs $1099

  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better value for money (84/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 10 points higher (76/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing leads (68/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing leads (84/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing (57/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (84/100 vs 64/100).

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing: The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 60 Ultra OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
AnTuTu 3113462 2545677
Geekbench Single 3041 2233
Geekbench Multi 9494 7478
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2912 1080x2392
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 68W 80W
Wireless charging 30W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 15, ColorOS 15
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 1300 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP64
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 163.6×76.0×8.2 mm
Weight 199 g 200 g
Price $1099 $250
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 16MP
32
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2392
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
68
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and OnePlus Ace 5 Racing, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
3113462 AnTuTu
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
66/100 -22.3%
2545677 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads OnePlus Ace 5 Racing by 22.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
$1099
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
$250

Price difference: $849. OnePlus Ace 5 Racing is cheaper by $849.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing (94/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing (57/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (84/100 vs 64/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing — 66/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 32/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 84/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.