Motorola Razr 50 vs Vivo iQOO Z7
The Motorola Razr 50 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 50 leads — 30/100 vs 26/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z7 has the bigger battery (4500 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Motorola Razr 50 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z7 doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Z7 is noticeably lighter (173g vs 188g).
Motorola Razr 50
Vivo iQOO Z7
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (2/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 4500 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 44W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 173g vs 188g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Longer battery life (30/100 vs 22/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (83/100 vs 65/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 50 vs the Vivo iQOO Z7, the Motorola Razr 50 scores 4 points higher (30/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 50 and the Vivo iQOO Z7 are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 and the Motorola Razr 50 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (30/100 vs 22/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (83/100 vs 65/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Motorola Razr 50 | Vivo iQOO Z7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | — | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 92 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.3×74.0×7.3 mm | 158.9×73.5×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 173 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Motorola Razr 50
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO Z7
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr 50
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Motorola Razr 50
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 50 and the Vivo iQOO Z7 are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 and the Motorola Razr 50 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (30/100 vs 22/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (83/100 vs 65/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 50 or the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Motorola Razr 50 edges out the Vivo iQOO Z7 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 50 and the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Motorola Razr 50 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 — 26/100.
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 50 over the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Motorola Razr 50 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z7 is a better fit for everyday use.