Motorola Razr 50 vs Nubia Flip2
The Motorola Razr 50 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, while the Nubia Flip2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X. Both devices score the same overall rating of 51/100. Key differences: the Nubia Flip2 has the bigger battery (4325 mAh vs 4200).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 50
Nubia Flip2
What makes Motorola Razr 50 better?
- Lighter: 188g vs 193g
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 68/100)
What makes Nubia Flip2 better?
- Bigger battery: 4325 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 33W vs 30W
- Better camera (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
The Motorola Razr 50 and the Nubia Flip2 received the same MobileRank rating — 51/100. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100. In the "display" category, the Nubia Flip2 and the Motorola Razr 50 are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Nubia Flip2 and the Motorola Razr 50 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 50 and the Nubia Flip2 are nearly equal (36/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 is a bit better (74/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 50 | Nubia Flip2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 879714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" Foldable OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1188x2790 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 4325 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 33W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 92 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.3×74.0×7.3 mm | 170.0×76.0×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 193 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 50
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Nubia Flip2
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 50
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nubia Flip2
- 6.9" Foldable OLED
- Resolution: 1188x2790
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 50
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
Nubia Flip2
- 4325 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 50 and Nubia Flip2, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Nubia Flip2 and the Motorola Razr 50 are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nubia Flip2 and the Motorola Razr 50 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 50 and the Nubia Flip2 are nearly equal (36/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 is a bit better (74/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 50 or the Nubia Flip2?
Both devices scored 51/100. They are identical on performance — 55/100 for both. The clearest difference is portability: better on the Motorola Razr 50 (74/100 vs 68/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 50 and the Nubia Flip2?
The Motorola Razr 50 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Nubia Flip2 — 51/100.
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 50 over the Nubia Flip2?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Motorola Razr 50 (74/100 vs 68/100).