Motorola Razr 40 vs Redmi Turbo 5
The Motorola Razr 40 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, while the Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra; estimated prices are $586 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 54/100 vs 34/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Redmi Turbo 5 is faster in AnTuTu (2,809,170 vs 840,330); the Motorola Razr 40 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 204g).
Motorola Razr 40
Redmi Turbo 5
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 204g
- Better camera (48/100 vs 32/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 45/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2809170 vs 840330
- Better Geekbench Single: 1553 vs 1039
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6403 vs 2885
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
- Cheaper: $250 vs $586
- Higher performance (43/100 vs 1/100)
- Longer battery life (72/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (93/100 vs 69/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 vs the Redmi Turbo 5, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 20 points higher (54/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (43/100 vs 1/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 leads (48/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (72/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (93/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (43/100 vs 1/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (48/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (72/100 vs 20/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (65/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (93/100 vs 69/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 | Redmi Turbo 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 840330 | 2809170 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1039 | 1553 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2885 | 6403 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2756x1268 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 7560 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.4 mm | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 204 g | |
| Price | $586 | $250 |
Motorola Razr 40
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Motorola Razr 40
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 40
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 40 and Redmi Turbo 5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 leads Motorola Razr 40 by 70.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $336. Redmi Turbo 5 is cheaper by $336.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (43/100 vs 1/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (48/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (72/100 vs 20/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (65/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (93/100 vs 69/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 by 20 points (54/100 vs 34/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 and the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Motorola Razr 40 has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 — 54/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Motorola Razr 40 leads on camera score (48/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on performance (43/100 vs 1/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 over the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Motorola Razr 40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.