Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Xiaomi 17T Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads — 82/100 vs 54/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17T Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17T Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,176,468 vs 1,425,446); the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is noticeably lighter (184g vs 205g).
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Lighter: 184g vs 205g
- Better portability (80/100 vs 54/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3176468 vs 1425446
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3800 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 5W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (63/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 26/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 91/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 17T Pro, the Xiaomi 17T Pro scores 28 points higher (82/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (92/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (63/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (87/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (92/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (63/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (87/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17T Pro (80/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Xiaomi 17T Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1425446 | 3176468 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 184 g | 205 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- Main: 12MP f/f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 3800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 18:30 hrs, total 36:42 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Xiaomi 17T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17T Pro leads Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 55.1% in our overall performance rating.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (92/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (63/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (87/100 vs 26/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17T Pro (80/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 28 points (82/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Xiaomi 17T Pro — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Xiaomi 17T Pro leads on camera score (63/100 vs 23/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Xiaomi 17T Pro leads on performance (92/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.