Motorola Moto G67 vs Tecno Camon 50 Pro
The Motorola Moto G67 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate; launch prices were $240 and $320. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads — 65/100 vs 51/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5200); the Tecno Camon 50 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,059,715 vs 528,398).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G67
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
What makes Motorola Moto G67 better?
- Cheaper at launch: $240 vs $320
- Better portability (77/100 vs 64/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1059715 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 1061 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3185 vs 1980
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (59/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (64/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (92/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Moto G67 vs the Tecno Camon 50 Pro, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro scores 14 points higher (65/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads (59/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads (64/100 vs 40/100). Value score: Motorola Moto G67 — 54/100, Tecno Camon 50 Pro — 66/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 (59/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 (64/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro is a bit better (58/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G67 is a bit better (77/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Moto G67 | Tecno Camon 50 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 528398 | 1059715 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1272x2772 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×77.4×7.3 mm | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 182 g | — | |
| Launch price | $240 | $320 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G67
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G67
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1272x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G67
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Moto G67 and Tecno Camon 50 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads Motorola Moto G67 by 50.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $80. Motorola Moto G67 was $80 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 (59/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 (64/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro is a bit better (58/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G67 is a bit better (77/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G67 or the Tecno Camon 50 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto G67 — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G67 and the Tecno Camon 50 Pro?
The Motorola Moto G67 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro — 65/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G67 or the Tecno Camon 50 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads on camera score (64/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G67 or the Tecno Camon 50 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads on performance (59/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G67 over the Tecno Camon 50 Pro?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (64/100 vs 40/100).