Motorola Moto G64 vs Redmi Note 8T
The Motorola Moto G64 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025, while the Redmi Note 8T (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Moto G64 leads — 32/100 vs 16/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G64 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP.
Motorola Moto G64
Redmi Note 8T
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Better camera (31/100 vs 25/100)
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 190g vs 192g
- Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 60/100)
- Better value for money (96/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G64 vs the Redmi Note 8T, the Motorola Moto G64 scores 16 points higher (32/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 leads (48/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 8T leads (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8T (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (31/100 vs 25/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8T (48/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 8T and the Motorola Moto G64 are nearly equal (62/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 8T significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (96/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto G64 | Redmi Note 8T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 329457 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 321 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1128 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.3" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 161.6×73.8×8.9 mm | 161.1×75.4×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 190 g | |
| Price | — | $200 |
Motorola Moto G64
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi Note 8T
- Main: 48MP
- Front: 13MP
Motorola Moto G64
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 8T
- 6.3" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Motorola Moto G64
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Note 8T
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Motorola Moto G64
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8T (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (31/100 vs 25/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8T (48/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 8T and the Motorola Moto G64 are nearly equal (62/100 vs 60/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 8T significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (96/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Redmi Note 8T?
The Motorola Moto G64 is noticeably better than the Redmi Note 8T — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G64 and the Redmi Note 8T?
The Motorola Moto G64 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Redmi Note 8T — 16/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Redmi Note 8T?
The Motorola Moto G64 leads on camera score (31/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G64 over the Redmi Note 8T?
The Motorola Moto G64 is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Note 8T is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.