Motorola Moto G64 vs Poco F7
The Motorola Moto G64 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025, while the Poco F7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 leads — 51/100 vs 32/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the Motorola Moto G64 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 215g).
Motorola Moto G64
Poco F7
- Lighter: 192g vs 215g
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 31/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
- Higher performance (40/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (32/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (65/100 vs 48/100)
- Better value for money (82/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G64 vs the Poco F7, the Poco F7 scores 19 points higher (51/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 leads (40/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 leads (65/100 vs 48/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 leads (82/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (40/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 and the Motorola Moto G64 are nearly equal (32/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (65/100 vs 48/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G64 notably outperforms the Poco F7 (60/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (82/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto G64 | Poco F7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2205289 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 2070 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 6694 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2712x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.6×73.8×8.9 mm | 163.1×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 215 g | |
| Price | — | $399 |
Motorola Moto G64
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco F7
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Motorola Moto G64
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto G64
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Poco F7
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Moto G64
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (40/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 and the Motorola Moto G64 are nearly equal (32/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (65/100 vs 48/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G64 notably outperforms the Poco F7 (60/100 vs 31/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (82/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Poco F7?
The Poco F7 is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto G64 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G64 and the Poco F7?
The Motorola Moto G64 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Poco F7 — 51/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Poco F7?
The Poco F7 leads on performance (40/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G64 over the Poco F7?
The Motorola Moto G64 is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco F7 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.